#676

RE: Der Coronavirus

in Politik 21.03.2020 12:09
von Rico (gelöscht)
avatar

Bei Söder sind die Initialen und der sexy Akzent die beiden Schlüsselqualifikationen.
:-)


nach oben springen

#677

RE: Der Coronavirus

in Politik 21.03.2020 12:13
von Hans Bergman | 23.327 Beiträge

Zitat von Rico im Beitrag #676
Bei Söder sind die Initialen und der sexy Akzent die beiden Schlüsselqualifikationen.
:-)

Ich habe mir vor etwa einem Jahr ein handsigniertes Poster von ihm schicken lassen. Ich kenne eben den Ausdruck, Kleinvieh macht auch Mist. Ich dachte, das kostet ihn immerhin etwas Zeit und Geld.
Ein Mann, der als Junge ein Poster von Franz Joseph Strauss in seinem Zimmer hatte, ist mir viel mehr als nur suspekt.



nach oben springen

#678

RE: Der Coronavirus

in Politik 21.03.2020 12:14
von Leto_II. | 27.808 Beiträge

Zitat von Rico im Beitrag #676
Bei Söder sind die Initialen und der sexy Akzent die beiden Schlüsselqualifikationen.
:-)

Multiple Sklerose?


nach oben springen

#679

RE: Der Coronavirus

in Politik 21.03.2020 12:21
von Leto_II. | 27.808 Beiträge

Zitat von Maga-neu im Beitrag #675


https://www.zeit.de/politik/deutschland/...ulPRR68dnGEsdEA

Bisher übertreffen sich die Grünen mal wieder.


Söder erarbeitet sich gerade einen Amtsbonus zu nächsten Kanzlerwahl, da kann die Opposition natürlich nicht schweigen.


nach oben springen

#680

RE: Der Coronavirus

in Politik 21.03.2020 12:26
von Maga-neu | 35.163 Beiträge

https://amp.ft.com/content/e015e096-6532...u-OOk2XnHM3RBDM

Im Augenblick würde ich am liebsten in Taiwan leben.


nach oben springen

#681

RE: Der Coronavirus

in Politik 21.03.2020 12:54
von Rico (gelöscht)
avatar

Ältere Menschen kommen seltener raus, deshalb sind sie krankheitsgefährdeter.


nach oben springen

#682

RE: Der Coronavirus

in Politik 21.03.2020 13:06
von Rico (gelöscht)
avatar

Bergman, Söder hatte kein FJS Poster in seinem Zimmer hängen, das sagt er nur opportunistischerweise.

Leto, er agiert anfallsweise....


nach oben springen

#683

RE: Der Coronavirus

in Politik 21.03.2020 13:28
von Rico (gelöscht)
avatar

Das Krankheitsrisiko steigt nicht mit der Anzahl von Kontakten, sondern mit der Anzahl von Konflikten. Die chinesische Medizin ist da weiter als die westliche, esoterisch ausgerichtete Medizin.


nach oben springen

#684

RE: Der Coronavirus

in Politik 21.03.2020 13:36
von Hans Bergman | 23.327 Beiträge

Zitat von Rico im Beitrag #682
Leto, er agiert anfallsweise....
So sehe ich das auch. :-))



nach oben springen

#685

RE: Der Coronavirus

in Politik 21.03.2020 13:38
von Hans Bergman | 23.327 Beiträge

Zitat von Leto_II. im Beitrag #679
...Söder erarbeitet sich gerade einen Amtsbonus zu nächsten Kanzlerwahl, da kann die Opposition natürlich nicht schweigen.
Was dem einen seine Sturmflut...



nach oben springen

#686

RE: Der Coronavirus

in Politik 21.03.2020 15:10
von Willie (gelöscht)
nach oben springen

#687

RE: Der Coronavirus

in Politik 21.03.2020 15:21
von Maga-neu | 35.163 Beiträge

Zitat von Willie im Beitrag #686
https://scontent-ort2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/89968029_10159539977603327_2397238397149118464_n.jpg?_nc_cat=1&_nc_sid=8024bb&_nc_ohc=-8YMxZLiTG0AX_huPSJ&_nc_ht=scontent-ort2-1.xx&oh=b60fb34b31a83c2a4bf605c26e14a42e&oe=5E9C9440

Außer natürlich, es handelt sich bei den anderen um Trump-Wähler, Nationalisten, Populisten oder Klimaleugner.


nach oben springen

#688

RE: Der Coronavirus

in Politik 21.03.2020 15:29
von Rico (gelöscht)
avatar

Stickerphilosophie.


nach oben springen

#689

RE: Der Coronavirus

in Politik 21.03.2020 15:48
von Willie (gelöscht)
nach oben springen

#690

RE: Der Coronavirus

in Politik 21.03.2020 15:59
von Willie (gelöscht)
zuletzt bearbeitet 21.03.2020 16:37 | nach oben springen

#691

RE: Der Coronavirus

in Politik 21.03.2020 17:22
von Willie (gelöscht)
avatar

The Coronavirus Could Reshape Global Order
China Is Maneuvering for International Leadership as the United States Falters

With hundreds of millions of people now isolating themselves around the world, the novel coronavirus pandemic has become a truly global event. And while its geopolitical implications should be considered secondary to matters of health and safety, those implications may, in the long term, prove just as consequential—especially when it comes to the United States’ global position. Global orders have a tendency to change gradually at first and then all at once. In 1956, a botched intervention in the Suez laid bare the decay in British power and marked the end of the United Kingdom’s reign as a global power. Today, U.S. policymakers should recognize that if the United States does not rise to meet the moment, the coronavirus pandemic could mark another “Suez moment.”

It is now clear to all but the most blinkered partisans that Washington has botched its initial response. Missteps by key institutions, from the White House and the Department of Homeland Security to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), have undermined confidence in the capacity and competence of U.S. governance. Public statements by President Donald Trump, whether Oval Office addresses or early-morning tweets, have largely served to sow confusion and spread uncertainty. Both public and private sectors have proved ill-prepared to produce and distribute the tools necessary for testing and response. And internationally, the pandemic has amplified Trump’s instincts to go it alone and exposed just how unprepared Washington is to lead a global response.

The status of the United States as a global leader over the past seven decades has been built not just on wealth and power but also, and just as important, on the legitimacy that flows from the United States’ domestic governance, provision of global public goods, and ability and willingness to muster and coordinate a global response to crises. The coronavirus pandemic is testing all three elements of U.S. leadership. So far, Washington is failing the test.

As Washington falters, Beijing is moving quickly and adeptly to take advantage of the opening created by U.S. mistakes, filling the vacuum to position itself as the global leader in pandemic response. It is working to tout its own system, provide material assistance to other countries, and even organize other governments. The sheer chutzpah of China’s move is hard to overstate. After all, it was Beijing’s own missteps—especially its efforts at first to cover up the severity and spread of the outbreak—that helped create the very crisis now afflicting much of the world. Yet Beijing understands that if it is seen as leading, and Washington is seen as unable or unwilling to do so, this perception could fundamentally alter the United States’ position in global politics and the contest for leadership in the twenty-first century. ...
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/...pe-global-order

Ein langer Artikel, denn es in Gaenze zu lesen lohnt.


nach oben springen

#692

RE: Der Coronavirus

in Politik 21.03.2020 17:26
von Maga-neu | 35.163 Beiträge

Ich habe die britische Regierung von Johnson immer verteidigt, aber ihr Krisenmanagement kann man nur als grottig bezeichnen.
https://www.gmx.net/magazine/news/corona...reffen-34538432

Es ist auch nicht so, dass ich die EU zum Schuldigen mache. Die EU hat sich in dieser Krise als nutzlos und überflüssig erwiesen - das ist etwas anderes als eine Schuldzuweisung. Auch die Verantwortung für die Reduktion der Intensivbetten tragen italienische Politiker, vor allem Romano Prodi, der die Defizitkriterien unbedingt einhalten wollte (im Gegensatz zum Berlusca, der immer die Spendierhosen anhatte). btw, für seine "Erfolge" wurde Prodi zum EU-Kommissionspräsidenten gewählt.


nach oben springen

#693

RE: Der Coronavirus

in Politik 21.03.2020 17:29
von Maga-neu | 35.163 Beiträge

Zitat von Willie im Beitrag #691
The Coronavirus Could Reshape Global Order
China Is Maneuvering for International Leadership as the United States Falters

With hundreds of millions of people now isolating themselves around the world, the novel coronavirus pandemic has become a truly global event. And while its geopolitical implications should be considered secondary to matters of health and safety, those implications may, in the long term, prove just as consequential—especially when it comes to the United States’ global position. Global orders have a tendency to change gradually at first and then all at once. In 1956, a botched intervention in the Suez laid bare the decay in British power and marked the end of the United Kingdom’s reign as a global power. Today, U.S. policymakers should recognize that if the United States does not rise to meet the moment, the coronavirus pandemic could mark another “Suez moment.”

It is now clear to all but the most blinkered partisans that Washington has botched its initial response. Missteps by key institutions, from the White House and the Department of Homeland Security to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), have undermined confidence in the capacity and competence of U.S. governance. Public statements by President Donald Trump, whether Oval Office addresses or early-morning tweets, have largely served to sow confusion and spread uncertainty. Both public and private sectors have proved ill-prepared to produce and distribute the tools necessary for testing and response. And internationally, the pandemic has amplified Trump’s instincts to go it alone and exposed just how unprepared Washington is to lead a global response.

The status of the United States as a global leader over the past seven decades has been built not just on wealth and power but also, and just as important, on the legitimacy that flows from the United States’ domestic governance, provision of global public goods, and ability and willingness to muster and coordinate a global response to crises. The coronavirus pandemic is testing all three elements of U.S. leadership. So far, Washington is failing the test.

As Washington falters, Beijing is moving quickly and adeptly to take advantage of the opening created by U.S. mistakes, filling the vacuum to position itself as the global leader in pandemic response. It is working to tout its own system, provide material assistance to other countries, and even organize other governments. The sheer chutzpah of China’s move is hard to overstate. After all, it was Beijing’s own missteps—especially its efforts at first to cover up the severity and spread of the outbreak—that helped create the very crisis now afflicting much of the world. Yet Beijing understands that if it is seen as leading, and Washington is seen as unable or unwilling to do so, this perception could fundamentally alter the United States’ position in global politics and the contest for leadership in the twenty-first century. ...
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/...pe-global-order

Ein langer Artikel, denn es in Gaenze zu lesen lohnt.
Ja, klingt wirklich mal interessant (anders als der Dummschwatz von The Guardian und Co.), aber im Prinzip wirkt sich diese Krise nur als Katalysator aus.


nach oben springen

#694

RE: Der Coronavirus

in Politik 21.03.2020 17:51
von Willie (gelöscht)
avatar

China, on virus PR offensive, sends masks and experts abroad
As the fight against a new virus shifts to Europe and beyond, China is supplying millions of masks and other desperately needed items to struggling governments, hoping to build political ties and defuse criticism that it allowed the disease to spread early on.

Serbia’s president plans to be at the airport this weekend to welcome a shipment of medical supplies from his “brother and friend,” Chinese leader Xi Jinping. Xi’s government has flown gloves and protective clothing to Liberia. It is sending 100,000 test kits to the Philippines. More than 10 flights carrying millions of masks and other supplies are bound for the Czech Republic this week.
China, said Czech Interior Minister Jan Hamacek, is “the only country capable of supplying Europe with such amounts.”

It’s part of an effort by the Communist Party to reshape the narrative, from one of early missteps to a nation that acted decisively to bring the outbreak under control. China is touting its deliveries of ventilators and masks overseas and dispatching its medical experts to share the lessons of its success.
China hopes to benefit from a realization in the West of how difficult it is to bring the virus under control, said Julian Ku, a law professor at Hofstra University in New York.
“The Chinese government’s failures ... will be less harshly viewed in light of the failures of other governments to respond effectively as well,” he said.

Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic blasted the European Union and praised China for offering help when he announced a state of emergency to combat the outbreak. His country wants to join the EU, but his government has moved closer to Russia and China in a seesaw battle for influence.
“I believe in my brother and friend Xi Jinping and I believe in China’s help,” Vucic said. “European solidarity,” he said, was just a fairy tale.
EU officials denied they were stopping aid to Serbia, but said their first priority was EU members. ...

... China moved quickly to send experts and equipment to Italy, which last year became the first western European country to join China’s Belt and Road Initiative. The massive program seeks to expand trade by building ports, roads and other transportation projects in a 21st century version of the fabled Silk Road.
China is ready to work with Italy to contribute to international cooperation on epidemic control and to the building of a “Health Silk Road,” Xi was quoted as telling Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte in a phone call Monday.
“It’s not an accident that the heat map of where Xi Jinping is sending condolences and China is sending N95 masks overlaps pretty closely with those countries that have demonstrated a willingness to accommodate China,” said Daniel Russel, a former senior U.S. diplomat now with the Asia Society Policy Institute in New York. ...
https://apnews.com/eca869390e67736df891003862e1aeae



zuletzt bearbeitet 21.03.2020 17:52 | nach oben springen

#695

RE: Der Coronavirus

in Politik 21.03.2020 18:14
von Willie (gelöscht)
nach oben springen

#696

RE: Der Coronavirus

in Politik 21.03.2020 19:06
von Hans Bergman | 23.327 Beiträge

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TcIsVADA...skQu1GtRI3oX0K0

Die AfD hätte jedenfalls früher gehandelt. Schon am 4. März forderte Alice Weidel Corona-Kontrollen and den Grenzen. Sie wurde von den Verbrauchtparteien (FB-Fund) ausgelacht und beschimpft.



nach oben springen

#697

RE: Der Coronavirus

in Politik 21.03.2020 19:15
von Willie (gelöscht)
avatar

Coronavirus: Nigeria reports chloroquine poisonings after Donald Trump touts antimalarial drug as treatment
Health authorities see long queues at pharmacies in wake of US president’s remarks
Surge in interest raises concerns about people ‘self-medicating without guidance’

Authorities in Nigerian megacity Lagos said on Friday that hospitals had seen cases of chloroquine poisoning after US President Donald Trump touted the drug as a treatment against the coronavirus.
Trump said during a press conference on Thursday that the antimalarial drug had been “approved” to treat Covid-19 by the US Food and Drug Administration, only for the head of the agency to push back and say it had not yet been given a definitive green light.
https://www.scmp.com/news/world/africa/a...gs-after-donald


Please Take Medical Advice From Your Doctor, Not the President.
To fight the coronavirus, Trump is pushing an unproven and dangerous drug.
https://www.motherjones.com/coronavirus-...mp-chloroquine/



zuletzt bearbeitet 21.03.2020 19:16 | nach oben springen

#698

RE: Der Coronavirus

in Politik 21.03.2020 19:20
von Willie (gelöscht)
avatar

A Medical Worker Describes Terrifying Lung Failure From COVID-19 — Even in His Young Patients
“It first struck me how different it was when I saw my first coronavirus patient go bad. I was like, Holy shit, this is not the flu. Watching this relatively young guy, gasping for air, pink frothy secretions coming out of his tube.”
https://www.propublica.org/article/a-med...-young-patients


nach oben springen

#699

RE: Der Coronavirus

in Politik 21.03.2020 19:39
von Willie (gelöscht)
avatar

'We should start thinking about the next one': Coronavirus is just the first of many pandemics to come, environmentalists warn
“I’m absolutely sure that there are going to be more diseases like this in future if we continue with our practices of destroying the natural world," says marine ecologist Dr Enric Sala
https://www.independent.co.uk/environmen...q1avGAGe_ZPx_fE


nach oben springen

#700

RE: Der Coronavirus

in Politik 21.03.2020 19:42
von Willie (gelöscht)
nach oben springen



Besucher
0 Mitglieder und 8 Gäste sind Online

Wir begrüßen unser neuestes Mitglied: Corto
Besucherzähler
Heute waren 309 Gäste und 3 Mitglieder online.

Forum Statistiken
Das Forum hat 1450 Themen und 323556 Beiträge.

Heute waren 3 Mitglieder Online:
Landegaard, Maga-neu, nahal

Xobor Einfach ein eigenes Forum erstellen